Early detection of breast cancer by mammography screening

This fact box will help you to weigh the benefits and harms of early detection of breast cancer by mammography screening. The information and numbers are based on the best scientific evidence currently available.

This fact box was developed by the Harding Center for Risk Literacy.

What is breast cancer? 

Breast cancer develops when abnormal cells multiply in an uncontrolled manner and gradually turn into lumps or growths in the breast tissue. Cancer cells can infiltrate healthy tissue and metastasize. Factors such as age, family history, and hormonal influences can affect the development of breast cancer. It is assumed that about 8 out of 100 cases of breast cancer are hereditary and can be traced back to the so-called “breast cancer genes,” BRCA1 and BRCA2 [2]. Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women in Germany, with about 70,000 new cases per year [3].

What is early detection of breast cancer by mammography screening? 

Early detection (screening) targets people who do not show symptoms of a particular disease (here, breast cancer).The aim is to detect and treat breast cancer at an early stage in order to increase chances of recovery.

A mammography is an X-ray examination of the breast in which two X-rays are taken from different angles. These X-rays are each assessed independently by two doctors [4].

Who might consider mammography screening?

Women in Germany between 50 and 69 years of age can participate in mammography screening every two years. This service is paid for by German health insurance funds [5]. It is an organized screening program to which women are sent personal invitation letters.

What are the alternative options for early detection?

Alternative early detection procedures include ultrasound (sonography) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. It remains unclear whether these procedures help lower the risk of dying from breast cancer [4].

Fact box_mammography_EN
What does the fact box show?

The fact box shows the benefits and harms of mammography screening compared to no mammography screening.

The table may be read as follows:

5 out of every 1,000 women without screening and 4 out of every 1,000 women with screening died from breast cancer over a time period of approximately 11 years.

The numbers in the fact box are rounded. They were reported in 8 studies with about 600,000 participants [1].

What other aspects should be considered?

On behalf of the Federal Joint Committee (a decision-making body of the joint self-government of physicians, dentists, hospitals, and health insurance funds in Germany), the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) developed an invitation letter and a decision aid for mammography screening [4].

This decision aid presents data for women aged 50 to 69 who regularly participate in mammography screening for 20 years. Regularly participating in screening is said to save 2 to 6 out of every 1,000 women from dying from breast cancer [4].

Note, however, that most studies observed participants for about 11 years and that no study data are available for the time frame of 20 years [4]. Therefore, the numbers in the decision aid are based on estimates only.

For that reason, the fact box shows numbers for women who participated in screening for approximately 11 years. It shows that regular participation can save 1 out of every 1,000 women from dying from breast cancer.

Screening did not affect the total number of deaths when all potential causes of death are considered. About 84 out of every 1,000 women died in total, independent of whether they were screened.

Furthermore, women with false alarms (false positive findings) can suffer from psychological distress, including anxiety and uncertainty, for years afterward [1].

A positive result does not automatically mean cancer. Mammography screening also detects preliminary stages of breast cancer, such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which is characterized by abnormal cells in the mammary ducts that have not spread to other tissue (non-invasive). In some women DCIS remains harmless; in others it develops into an invasive tumor, which can be life-threatening [4].

Any screening can lead to overdiagnosis. In the case of breast cancer this means that women are diagnosed with breast cancers that would have remained undetected without the screening. One instance of these are small tumors that grow slowly or not at all (non-progressive cancer) and might never have caused any complaints. Because it is difficult for physicians to assess whether a tumor will continue to grow, they often advise their patients to receive treatment.

Overdiagnosis often leads to overtreatment, which means unnecessary surgery or radiation [4].

Do the results provide proof (evidence) for the benefits and harms of early detection of breast cancer by mammography screening?

Overall, the evidence is of moderate to high quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on some findings (where the quality of evidence is moderate), while other findings are very unlikely to be changed in the course of further research (where the quality of evidence is high) [6].

Last update

March 2018

Icon Array visualizing the data

Icon Array Mammography
© Harding Center for Risk Literacy


Information within the fact box was obtained from the following sources:

[1] Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013(6) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5.

[2] Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum. Krebsinformationsdienst. Familiärer Brust und Eierstockkrebs 2018 [Available from: https://www.krebsinformationsdienst.de/wegweiser/iblatt/iblatt-familiaer... accessed 27.03.2018.

[3] Robert Koch-Institut. Krebs in Deutschland 2011/2012 2015 [Available from: www.gekid.de/Doc/krebs_in_deutschland_2015.pdf accessed 06.11.2017.

[4] IQWiG. Einladungsschreiben und Entscheidungshilfe zum Mammographie-Screening 2014. [Available from: www.iqwig.de/de/projekte-ergebnisse/projekte/gesundheitsinformation/p14-... accessed 06.12.2017.

[5] Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Früherkennungsuntersuchungen im Überblick 2016 [Available from: www.g-ba.de/institution/themenschwerpunkte/frueherkennung/ueberblick/ accessed 01.11.2016.

[6] Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Hodgson N, Ciliska D, et al. Breast cancer screening 2011. [Available from: www.canadiantaskforce.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/2011-breast-cancer-s... accessed 06.12.2017.

Fact boxes

The idea of fact boxes was developed by Lisa Schwartz and Steven Woloshin. In several studies they demonstrated that fact boxes were effective tools for informing the general public about benefits and harms of medical interventions. Read more in the overview.

Fact box download

Technical Terms

It is not always easy to evaluate (health) risks. To facilitate risk comprehension we have summarized and explained technical terms and criteria in a glossary.

A-D   E-G   H-K   L-N   O-R   S-Z

Helpful Questions for Life in an Uncertain World

We identified a couple of questions that help you face uncertainty and facilitate your understanding of risks across different situations.

to the questions...